# Melbourne v Carlton — AFL Wildcard Finals 2026 AI Prediction by Alphr

## Full Time: Melbourne 55 – 74 Carlton

_Carlton rally to topple Melbourne._

Half time: 36 – 35 · Alphr AI pre-game win probability: Melbourne 45% / Carlton 55% · MCG · Sat, 29 Aug, 07:35 pm AEST

**Goal Kickers** — Melbourne: Harvey Langford (8' 1st), Bailey Laurie (12'), Max Gawn (22'), Tom McDonald (58'), Bayley Fritsch (62' Tipped ⚡) · Carlton: Harry McKay (24' ×2 Tipped ⚡), Patrick Cripps (39'), Oliver Hollands (52'), Brodie Kemp (56' Tipped ⚡), Ben Ainsworth (75' ×2 Tipped ⚡), Jagga Smith (59' ×2)

### Match Winner — AI Prediction Market (resolved)

| Team | Pre-game AI win probability | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Carlton | 55% | Won |
| Melbourne | 45% | Lost |

Model call: **Correct** · Margin: 7.0 predicted → 19 actual · Markets hit: 4/4

_AI win probability priced pre-game · Markets hit = core betting markets._

### Full-Time Report

**Melbourne Demons vs Carlton Blues Prediction & Tips | AFL Wildcard Finals 2026**

_By Ben Dunlop · Published: 27 Aug 2026, 07:21 pm · Last updated: 29 Aug 2026, 10:11 pm_

Melbourne 55–74 Carlton in AFL Wildcard Finals at MCG. Here's how the result stacked up against the model's call, with the win-probability story and where the value landed.

At half-time, Melbourne held a narrow 36-35 lead over Carlton at the MCG. The game was still up for grabs. Carlton, however, turned the tables in the second half, securing a 74-55 victory. The one-point margin at the break suggested a tight contest, but Carlton's second-half performance was decisive, culminating in a 19-point win.

Carlton's dominance in disposals, 417 to Melbourne's 319, highlighted their control over the game. They didn't just hold onto the ball; they used it effectively, especially after the break. The Blues were more efficient inside forward 50, with 19 marks compared to Melbourne's 9, showcasing their ability to convert possession into scoring opportunities.

Melbourne had the edge in the midfield, winning 32 clearances to Carlton's 28. Yet, this advantage wasn't enough to stop Carlton's momentum. The Blues capitalised on their chances, demonstrating their superior defensive strength, rated at 1341 compared to Melbourne's 1139. This defensive prowess was evident as they stifled Melbourne's forward movements, limiting their scoring chances.

Melbourne's ruck division excelled, winning 33 hit-outs to Carlton's 20. Despite this dominance, they struggled to convert these efforts into a scoreboard advantage. The Demons couldn't consistently penetrate Carlton's defence, which limited their offensive output. Their 121 contested possessions against Carlton's 145 showed they were outmatched in physical contests.

Carlton's backline, rated stronger pre-match, stood firm when it mattered. Their ability to intercept and regain control was crucial, with both teams recording 73 intercepts each. Carlton's forward line, slightly stronger at 1168 against Melbourne's 1161, made the most of their opportunities, ensuring their efforts translated into crucial points in the final quarter.

Both teams entered the match in decent form, with Melbourne winning three of their last five games and Carlton winning four. Carlton's average margin of 34 points and tighter defence, conceding just 80.2 points per game compared to Melbourne's 99, reflected a side better equipped for the contest's latter stages.

Alphr's model had Carlton as favourites, giving them a 55% chance of winning. The predicted 7-point margin was modest compared to the actual 19-point difference. The combined point total of 129 was lower than the expected 168, indicating a more defensively-oriented game than anticipated. Carlton's second-half resurgence validated the model's prediction, aligning with the final outcome.

Ultimately, while Melbourne started strong, Carlton's cumulative efforts saw them pull away in the final quarter. The game demonstrated Carlton's ability to adapt and overcome challenges, key traits of a team with finals ambitions.

**Scoring by Quarter**

| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melbourne | 27 | 9 | 16 | 3 | 55 |
| Carlton | 9 | 26 | 21 | 18 | 74 |

**Key Match Stats**

| Melbourne | Stat | Carlton |
|---|---|---|
| 319 | Disposals | **417** |
| 121 | Contested poss. | **145** |
| **32** | Clearances | 28 |
| 45 | Inside 50s | **48** |
| 61 | Marks | **117** |
| 9 | Marks inside 50 | **19** |
| **58** | Tackles | 50 |
| **33** | Hit-outs | 20 |
| 73 | Intercepts | 73 |
| 0.0% | Disposal eff. | 0.0% |

**Model Report Card**

Our model correctly predicted Carlton to win at 55% probability. The predicted margin of 7.0 was reasonable against the actual 19-point result. The game's 129 points came in 39 points lower than the predicted 168. Carlton trailed 36–35 at half-time before staging a second-half comeback to win 55–74. A clean sweep, all 4 model picks hit for this match.

**Referee Watch**

Matt Stevic officiated this match (233 career games). The combined score of 129 points was 35 points below Matt Stevic's career average of 164. Carlton bucked the trend, Melbourne historically win 43% of games under Matt Stevic, but couldn't convert that edge today. Despite Matt Stevic's 55% career home-team win rate, the away side Carlton prevailed.

_Official AFL match stats · Generated by Alphr's model_

### Edge Analysis — the model's pre-game markets

- **Head to Head:** Carlton to win @ $1.70 (edge -3.5%) — model probability 55.3% — result: WON
- **Line / Spread:** Carlton -5.5 @ $1.90 (edge +1.5%) — result: WON
- **Margin Band:** Carlton 1-39 @ $3.30 (edge +0.0%) — result: WON
- **Total (Over/Under):** Under 174.5 @ $1.86 (edge +1.2%) — result: WON
- Predicted margin: Carlton by 7 · Predicted total: 168

### Match Preview (pre-match read)

Carlton are the call at 55%, but Melbourne stay live at 45%. The heaviest factor is the ratings gap: Carlton sit 134 ELO points clear, 1731 to 1597. Form leans Carlton's way: 4 from their last 5, against 3 for Melbourne.

Carlton own the matchup too, leading 5 of 7 factors including ELO Rating, Defence and Recent Form. The margin model has Carlton by 7.0, with the two sides combining for about 168. Lean Carlton, but it shapes as a genuine contest.

_Pre-match read · Alphr model_

### Umpire Indicator — Favours Melbourne

**Matt Stevic** — 233 career games since 2012 · panel: Matt Stevic, Brendan Hosking, Andrew Stephens.

| Team | Record under Matt Stevic | Win rate |
|---|---|---|
| Melbourne | 12W–16L | 43% |
| Carlton | 7W–23L | 23% |

Avg total: 164.3 pts · Home win %: 55% · Home bias: Leans home

When Matt Stevic officiates, Melbourne have won 12 of 28 games (43%), significantly stronger than Carlton's 7 from 30 (23%). Home teams win 55% of their matches (vs ~58% league avg). Panel: Matt Stevic, Brendan Hosking, Andrew Stephens.

### Recent Form (Last 5)

| Melbourne | Stat | Carlton |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 | Wins (Last 5) | 4.0 |
| 108.6pts | Avg Score | 114.2pts |
| 99.0pts | Avg Conceded | 80.2pts |
| 9.6pts | Avg Margin | 34.0pts |
| 365.4 | Disposals | 418.0 |
| 50.0 | Inside 50s | 50.0 |
| 59.0 | Tackles | 52.0 |
| 33.2 | Clearances | 39.4 |

### Form & History

_Last 5 games, oldest → newest._

| Team | Last 5 | Avg Pts |
|---|---|---|
| Melbourne | R20 L · R21 W · R22 W · R23 W · R24 L | 108.6 |
| Carlton | R20 W · R21 W · R22 W · R23 D · R24 W | 114.2 |

### H2H History (Last 5) — Carlton lead 4-1

| Season | Round | Home | Score | Away | Alphr's read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | R3 | Carlton | 77 – 100 | Melbourne | Carlton 66% ✗ |
| 2025 | R19 | Carlton | 78 – 70 | Melbourne | not priced |
| 2024 | R9 | Carlton | 77 – 76 | Melbourne | not priced |
| 2023 | QE | Melbourne | 71 – 73 | Carlton | not priced |
| 2023 | R22 | Carlton | 60 – 56 | Melbourne | not priced |

_Alphr's pre-match read was wrong in the one decided meeting it priced._

### Positional Matchup

_Season-to-date production per game with league-wide attack/defence tiers (18 teams)._

**Forwards** (Key Forwards · Med/Mid Forwards)

|  | Melbourne | Carlton |
|---|---|---|
| Attack rank | 8th | 11th |
| Defence rank | 15th (weak) | 4th (strong) |
| Goals scored · conceded | 225 · 230 | 207 · 190 |
| Goal Assists | 5.3/g | 4.4/g |
| Disposals | 101/g | 105/g |
| Inside 50s | 22/g | 19/g |
| Marks Inside 50 | 9/g | 10/g |
| Disposal Efficiency | 68.2% | 69.5% |

**Midfield & Ruck** (Midfielders · Rucks)

|  | Melbourne | Carlton |
|---|---|---|
| Attack rank | 2nd (strong) | 12th |
| Defence rank | 10th | 13th (weak) |
| Goals scored · conceded | 95 · 70 | 70 · 77 |
| Goal Assists | 4/g | 2.8/g |
| Disposals | 139/g | 148/g |
| Inside 50s | 23.9/g | 20.3/g |
| Marks Inside 50 | 3.5/g | 2.1/g |
| Disposal Efficiency | 69.3% | 71.6% |

**Defenders** (Key & Medium Defenders)

|  | Melbourne | Carlton |
|---|---|---|
| Attack rank | 11th | 13th (weak) |
| Defence rank | 2nd (strong) | 14th (weak) |
| Goals scored · conceded | 14 · 9 | 12 · 20 |
| Goal Assists | 1.7/g | 1.4/g |
| Disposals | 113/g | 138/g |
| Inside 50s | 10.7/g | 12.9/g |
| Marks Inside 50 | 0.4/g | 0.7/g |
| Disposal Efficiency | 80% | 77.6% |

**Who scores on Carlton** — Rucks 0.66/g (lg 0.52) +27% · Defenders 1.24/g (lg 1.05) +18% · Forwards 4.64/g (lg 4.49) +3%
**Who scores on Melbourne** — Defenders 1.17/g (lg 1.05) +11% · Forwards 4.64/g (lg 4.49) +3% · Key Forwards 3.96/g (lg 3.91) +1%

_Goals conceded by position, last 3 seasons; positive = concedes above league average to that position._

### Goal Scorer History — Who Kicks The Goals

_Last 10 games, career record vs the opponent and at MCG. ⚡ = our AI backs them to score; 🎯 = our AI's first-goal pick. 🏉 = scored in this game. Goal % = share of games with a goal, last 10 weighted double vs the 30 prior — historical frequency, not a market price._

**Melbourne** (team sheet)

| # | Player | Pos | 2026 | Last 10 | vs opp | Venue | Goal % | Alphr play | This game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | Bayley Fritsch | FWD | 35 in 21g | 21/10g (3·0·0·5·0·3·2·2·4·2) | 18/10g | 160/94g | 74% | ⚡ Anytime Goal $1.12 AI 82% ✓ Scored; 🎯 First Goal $11.00 AI 7% ✗ Not first | 🏉 62' |
| – | Kysaiah Pickett | MID | 28 in 23g | 9/10g (3·0·0·0·1·1·1·2·0·1) | 14/8g | 122/75g | 76% | — | — |
| – | Harrison Petty | KF | 25 in 19g | 22/10g (1·0·2·2·2·4·3·3·2·3) | 0/5g | 45/62g | 64% | ⚡ Anytime Goal $1.12 AI 78% ✓ Scored; 🎯 First Goal $11.00 AI 6% ✗ Not first | — |
| – | Harry Sharp | FWD | 25 in 23g | 9/10g (0·0·2·1·1·0·2·3·0·0) | 2/3g | 18/22g | 52% | — | — |
| – | Harvey Langford | MID | 22 in 23g | 6/10g (0·2·0·0·1·1·1·0·0·1) | 2/2g | 22/24g | 52% | — | 🏉 8' |
| – | Kade Chandler | FWD | 22 in 22g | 9/10g (0·1·2·0·0·0·0·1·4·1) | 3/7g | 49/59g | 60% | — | — |
| – | Bailey Laurie | FWD | 12 in 16g | 9/10g (1·0·0·1·0·1·1·3·2·0) | 0/0g | 8/18g | 42% | — | 🏉 12' |
| – | Ed Langdon | MID | 12 in 23g | 6/10g (1·0·1·0·0·3·0·0·0·1) | 7/13g | 35/85g | 34% | — | — |
| – | Max Gawn | RUC | 12 in 23g | 4/10g (2·0·0·2·0·0·0·0·0·0) | 8/15g | 69/137g | 34% | — | 🏉 22' |
| – | Tom Sparrow | MID | 12 in 23g | 6/10g (0·0·0·1·1·0·1·2·1·0) | 2/6g | 29/71g | 46% | — | — |
| – | Caleb Windsor | FWD | 9 in 20g | 5/10g (0·0·0·0·1·0·2·0·1·1) | 1/3g | 11/30g | 30% | — | — |
| – | Jake Melksham | FWD | 8 in 6g | 13/10g (1·2·0·2·4·0·2·0·2·0) | 16/14g | 106/93g | 66% | ⚡ Anytime Goal $1.35 AI 66% ✗ No goal | — |
| – | Jack Steele | MID | 4 in 23g | 1/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·1·0) | 3/12g | 6/32g | 18% | — | — |
| – | Koltyn Tholstrup | DEF | 3 in 23g | 1/10g (0·0·0·0·0·1·0·0·0·0) | 0/2g | 9/24g | 20% | — | — |
| – | Trent Rivers | DEF | 3 in 16g | 1/10g (1·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0) | 0/8g | 6/72g | 16% | — | — |
| – | Daniel Turner | DEF | 2 in 19g | 0/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0) | 1/2g | 12/30g | 18% | — | — |
| – | Jake Bowey | DEF | 2 in 15g | 2/10g (0·0·0·1·0·0·0·1·0·0) | 0/5g | 8/52g | 12% | — | — |
| – | Joel Fitzgerald | MID | 2 in 8g | 2/8g (0·0·0·0·2·0·0·0) | 0/0g | 0/4g | 13% | — | — |
| – | Tom McDonald | DEF | 2 in 10g | 2/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·2) | 17/15g | 80/138g | 10% | — | 🏉 58' |
| – | Xavier Lindsay | DEF | 1 in 6g | 3/10g (0·0·0·2·0·0·0·1·0·0) | 0/2g | 1/13g | 12% | — | — |
| – | Changkuoth Jiath | DEF | 0 in 15g | 0/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0) | 0/4g | 2/34g | 2% | — | — |
| – | Jack Viney | MID | no games | 2/10g (0·0·0·0·0·1·1·0·0·0) | 1/14g | 34/121g | 24% | — | — |
| – | Xavier Taylor | DEF | 0 in 2g | 0/2g (0·0) | 0/0g | 0/2g | 0% | — | — |

**Carlton** (team sheet)

| # | Player | Pos | 2026 | Last 10 | vs opp | Venue | Goal % | Alphr play | This game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | Brodie Kemp | KF | 36 in 23g | 15/10g (1·0·2·0·1·0·5·2·1·3) | 0/5g | 12/27g | 60% | ⚡ Anytime Goal $1.25 AI 72% ✓ Scored | 🏉 56' |
| – | Mitch McGovern | KF | 34 in 23g | 13/10g (0·2·1·2·2·2·1·2·1·0) | 8/10g | 46/51g | 62% | ⚡ Anytime Goal $1.20 AI 69% ✗ No goal | — |
| – | Harry McKay | KF | 32 in 21g | 18/10g (3·1·3·1·0·0·3·3·2·2) | 13/7g | 106/56g | 82% | ⚡ Anytime Goal $1.13 AI 83% ✓ Scored; 🎯 First Goal $11.00 AI 8% ✗ Not first | 🏉 24' 61' |
| – | Ben Ainsworth | FWD | 26 in 23g | 13/10g (1·1·1·1·2·1·1·2·0·3) | 6/7g | 13/13g | 76% | ⚡ Anytime Goal $1.44 AI 68% ✓ Scored | 🏉 75' 86' |
| – | Francis Evans | FWD | 22 in 21g | 17/10g (3·2·1·0·0·2·1·1·2·5) | 2/5g | 9/17g | 62% | ⚡ Anytime Goal $1.32 AI 74% ✗ No goal | — |
| – | Talor Byrne | FWD | 15 in 18g | 10/10g (0·3·0·1·0·3·2·1·0·0) | 1/1g | 5/7g | 50% | — | — |
| – | Patrick Cripps | MID | 14 in 23g | 6/10g (0·1·1·0·2·1·0·0·0·1) | 8/15g | 44/97g | 46% | — | 🏉 39' |
| – | George Hewett | MID | 13 in 19g | 9/10g (1·2·2·0·0·3·1·0·0·0) | 2/10g | 20/56g | 38% | — | — |
| – | Marc Pittonet | RUC | 10 in 20g | 4/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·1·2·1·0) | 2/8g | 6/38g | 26% | — | — |
| – | Jagga Smith | MID | 8 in 23g | 5/10g (0·1·0·0·1·0·2·0·0·1) | 1/1g | 2/8g | 33% | — | 🏉 59' 82' |
| – | Sam Walsh | MID | 8 in 23g | 5/10g (1·0·0·0·1·0·1·1·0·1) | 3/8g | 16/55g | 32% | — | — |
| – | Matthew Cottrell | FWD | 5 in 12g | 5/10g (2·1·0·0·1·0·1·0·0·0) | 0/6g | 12/33g | 44% | — | — |
| – | Adam Cerra | DEF | 4 in 20g | 2/10g (0·0·1·1·0·0·0·0·0·0) | 2/7g | 16/43g | 22% | — | — |
| – | Blake Acres | MID | 3 in 10g | 3/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·1·0·1·1) | 7/14g | 16/45g | 34% | — | — |
| – | Cooper Lord | MID | 2 in 9g | 2/10g (0·0·1·0·0·0·0·0·1·0) | 0/1g | 2/12g | 19% | — | — |
| – | Lewis Young | DEF | 2 in 12g | 2/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·1·1·0·0) | 0/3g | 2/27g | 18% | — | — |
| – | Oliver Florent | DEF | 2 in 23g | 1/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·1·0·0·0) | 3/13g | 1/29g | 10% | — | — |
| – | Oliver Hollands | MID | 2 in 12g | 2/10g (0·0·1·0·0·0·0·0·0·1) | 0/5g | 5/30g | 16% | — | 🏉 52' |
| – | Harry Dean | DEF | 1 in 20g | 1/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·1·0·0·0) | 0/1g | 0/7g | 7% | — | — |
| – | Billy Wilson | DEF | 0 in 15g | 0/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0) | 0/0g | 0/6g | 0% | — | — |
| – | Jacob Weitering | DEF | 0 in 12g | 0/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0) | 0/13g | 7/80g | 0% | — | — |
| – | Lachlan Cowan | DEF | 0 in 22g | 0/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0) | 0/3g | 2/25g | 2% | — | — |
| – | Nick Haynes | DEF | 0 in 18g | 0/10g (0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0·0) | 0/14g | 2/39g | 0% | — | — |

### Player Props — Disposal Counts

_Bookmaker disposal lines vs our model's read. ⚡ = the validated under signal (model ≥10 points past the price) — everything else is market intel, not a tip. The ⚡ under signal's verified record: 57.7% of 1,278 flags in 2025._

**Melbourne**

| Player | Line | Under | AI Under | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kysaiah Pickett ⚡ Under | 24.5 | $1.85 | 84% | 19 ✓ |
| Jake Bowey ⚡ Under | 24.5 | $1.86 | 67% | 26 ✗ |
| Tom Sparrow ⚡ Under | 23.5 | $1.89 | 70% | 10 ✓ |
| Max Gawn ⚡ Under | 22.5 | $1.93 | 72% | 18 ✓ |
| Jack Steele ⚡ Under | 22.5 | $1.92 | 64% | 23 ✗ |
| Koltyn Tholstrup ⚡ Under | 20.5 | $1.85 | 81% | 15 ✓ |
| Trent Rivers ⚡ Under | 20.5 | $1.91 | 66% | 17 ✓ |
| Jack Viney | 20.5 | — | 48% | 13 ✓ |
| Ed Langdon ⚡ Under | 19.5 | $1.97 | 64% | 18 ✓ |
| Joel Fitzgerald ⚡ Under | 19.5 | $1.80 | 75% | 15 ✓ |
| Will Hayward | 16.5 | — | 68% | — |
| Christian Salem | 16.5 | — | 42% | — |
| Matt Cottrell | 15.5 | $1.78 | — | — |
| Harvey Langford | 15.5 | $1.90 | 53% | 21 ✗ |

**Carlton**

| Player | Line | Under | AI Under | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Walsh | 28.5 | $1.88 | 58% | 39 ✗ |
| Patrick Cripps | 25.5 | $1.89 | 54% | 22 ✓ |
| George Hewett | 25.5 | $1.87 | 61% | 20 ✓ |
| Jagga Smith | 25.5 | $1.88 | 63% | 29 ✗ |
| Oliver Florent ⚡ Under | 24.5 | $1.95 | 76% | 24 ✓ |
| Adam Cerra | 21.5 | $1.81 | 61% | 26 ✗ |
| Billy Wilson ⚡ Under | 20.5 | $1.88 | 68% | 14 ✓ |
| Blake Acres | 20.5 | $1.86 | 50% | 17 ✓ |
| Cooper Lord | 19.5 | $1.86 | 54% | 17 ✓ |
| Nick Haynes | 17.5 | $1.85 | 51% | 19 ✗ |
| Ben Ainsworth ⚡ Under | 17.5 | $1.78 | 67% | 21 ✗ |
| Oliver Hollands | 17.5 | — | 60% | 18 ✗ |
| Lewis Young | 14.5 | — | 86% | 9 ✓ |
| Jacob Weitering | 14.5 | — | 52% | 18 ✗ |

### Prediction Breakdown — Pure Alpha Model

**Team ELO Ratings** — Melbourne 1597 · Carlton 1731 · ELO difference: 134 in favour of Carlton

**Positional Matchups** — lineup ELO by unit

| Unit | Melbourne | Carlton | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Midfield | 1115 (best 1193) | 1249 (best 1302) | Carlton +134 |
| Forwards | 1161 (best 1437) | 1168 (best 1328) | Carlton +7 |
| Defence | 1139 (best 1206) | 1341 (best 1466) | Carlton +202 |
| Ruck | 1557 (best 1557) | 1156 (best 1156) | Melbourne +401 |

**Key Prediction Factors** — what the model weighted most

| # | Factor | Weight | Favours |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ELO Rating | 23.8% | Carlton |
| 2 | Defence | 16.7% | Carlton |
| 3 | Ruck | 11.8% | Melbourne |
| 4 | Recent Form | 10.0% | Carlton |
| 5 | Lineup Strength | 8.7% | Carlton |
| 6 | Weather | 7.6% | Melbourne |
| 7 | Venue | 5.3% | Carlton |

**Model Confidence: 55%** — Carlton predicted to win by 7 points · Predicted total: 168 pts

**Record:** 4/4 predictions correct

**Prediction by Alphr** (https://alphr.com.au) — free AI predictions for every AFL, NRL & Super League match, published before kick-off and never edited. Verified track record: https://alphr.com.au/accuracy

---
Canonical URL: https://alphr.com.au/afl/match/2026-wf-melbourne-v-carlton
RSS feed: https://alphr.com.au/feed.xml
Prediction JSON API: today https://alphr.com.au/api/predictions/today · this week https://alphr.com.au/api/predictions/weekly
Markdown view for AI agents. Machine-readable index: https://alphr.com.au/llms.txt · full reference: https://alphr.com.au/llms-full.txt
All predictions are published before kick-off and verified after full time. Free, no login. 18+ gamble responsibly (AU).
Last updated: 2026-08-29 12:11 UTC (latest tip update)